Review



human recombinant lypd8  (Novus Biologicals)


Bioz Verified Symbol Novus Biologicals is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Novus Biologicals manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Novus Biologicals human recombinant lypd8
    RT-qPCR analysis and comparison of modulation of antimicrobial factors in caput and cauda epididymidis and <t>Lypd8</t> assessment in mouse and in vitro assay. ( A ) beta-defensins, ( B ) UPEC-associated antimicrobial factors. Unpaired t test ( * ) or Mann–Whitney U test (#) for each organ, respectively, comparing sham to UPEC-infected mice ( **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05). Fold change calculated via 2 (−ddCT) method. Data presented as box-and-whisker with median and min/max. cap = caput, cau = cauda. Sham 10 days, caput n = 4, cauda n = 4; UPEC 10 days, caput n = 4, cauda n = 6. ( C ) Laser-assisted microdissection of caput epithelium and caput interstitium from wild-type epididymis, n = 2. Relative expression calculated via 2 (−dCT) method. Data presented as mean ± SD. ( D ) Bacterial adherence to MEPC5 cells under the presence (+) or absence (−) of 1 μg/ml human recombinant LYPD8 (hLYPD8). CFU/ml were calculated after incubation of agar plates at 37°C for 24 h. Summary of three independent experiments with each time n = 2–3 per group. Unpaired t test comparing the number of MEPC5-adherent UPEC in the presence or absence of LYPD8 ( **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05).
    Human Recombinant Lypd8, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+recombinant+lypd8/Recombinant+Human+LYPD8+Fc+Chimera+Protein%2C+CF/pmc07187874-78-29-35
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human recombinant lypd8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Differential tissue-specific damage caused by bacterial epididymo-orchitis in the mouse"

    Article Title: Differential tissue-specific damage caused by bacterial epididymo-orchitis in the mouse

    Journal: Molecular Human Reproduction

    doi: 10.1093/molehr/gaaa011

    RT-qPCR analysis and comparison of modulation of antimicrobial factors in caput and cauda epididymidis and Lypd8 assessment in mouse and in vitro assay. ( A ) beta-defensins, ( B ) UPEC-associated antimicrobial factors. Unpaired t test ( * ) or Mann–Whitney U test (#) for each organ, respectively, comparing sham to UPEC-infected mice ( **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05). Fold change calculated via 2 (−ddCT) method. Data presented as box-and-whisker with median and min/max. cap = caput, cau = cauda. Sham 10 days, caput n = 4, cauda n = 4; UPEC 10 days, caput n = 4, cauda n = 6. ( C ) Laser-assisted microdissection of caput epithelium and caput interstitium from wild-type epididymis, n = 2. Relative expression calculated via 2 (−dCT) method. Data presented as mean ± SD. ( D ) Bacterial adherence to MEPC5 cells under the presence (+) or absence (−) of 1 μg/ml human recombinant LYPD8 (hLYPD8). CFU/ml were calculated after incubation of agar plates at 37°C for 24 h. Summary of three independent experiments with each time n = 2–3 per group. Unpaired t test comparing the number of MEPC5-adherent UPEC in the presence or absence of LYPD8 ( **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05).
    Figure Legend Snippet: RT-qPCR analysis and comparison of modulation of antimicrobial factors in caput and cauda epididymidis and Lypd8 assessment in mouse and in vitro assay. ( A ) beta-defensins, ( B ) UPEC-associated antimicrobial factors. Unpaired t test ( * ) or Mann–Whitney U test (#) for each organ, respectively, comparing sham to UPEC-infected mice ( **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05). Fold change calculated via 2 (−ddCT) method. Data presented as box-and-whisker with median and min/max. cap = caput, cau = cauda. Sham 10 days, caput n = 4, cauda n = 4; UPEC 10 days, caput n = 4, cauda n = 6. ( C ) Laser-assisted microdissection of caput epithelium and caput interstitium from wild-type epididymis, n = 2. Relative expression calculated via 2 (−dCT) method. Data presented as mean ± SD. ( D ) Bacterial adherence to MEPC5 cells under the presence (+) or absence (−) of 1 μg/ml human recombinant LYPD8 (hLYPD8). CFU/ml were calculated after incubation of agar plates at 37°C for 24 h. Summary of three independent experiments with each time n = 2–3 per group. Unpaired t test comparing the number of MEPC5-adherent UPEC in the presence or absence of LYPD8 ( **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05).

    Techniques Used: Quantitative RT-PCR, Comparison, In Vitro, MANN-WHITNEY, Infection, Whisker Assay, Laser Capture Microdissection, Expressing, Recombinant, Incubation

    Related Articles

    In Vitro:

    Article Title: Differential tissue-specific damage caused by bacterial epididymo-orchitis in the mouse
    Article Snippet: .. To assess the effects of LYPD8 on bacterial adherence to epididymal epithelial cells in vitro , UPEC were pre-incubated for 1 h on ice with or without 1 μg/ml human recombinant LYPD8 (product no. 9087-C4, Novus Biological, CO, USA) ( Okumura et al ., 2016 ) before infection of MEPC5 cells. ..

    Recombinant:

    Article Title: Differential tissue-specific damage caused by bacterial epididymo-orchitis in the mouse
    Article Snippet: .. To assess the effects of LYPD8 on bacterial adherence to epididymal epithelial cells in vitro , UPEC were pre-incubated for 1 h on ice with or without 1 μg/ml human recombinant LYPD8 (product no. 9087-C4, Novus Biological, CO, USA) ( Okumura et al ., 2016 ) before infection of MEPC5 cells. ..

    Infection:

    Article Title: Differential tissue-specific damage caused by bacterial epididymo-orchitis in the mouse
    Article Snippet: .. To assess the effects of LYPD8 on bacterial adherence to epididymal epithelial cells in vitro , UPEC were pre-incubated for 1 h on ice with or without 1 μg/ml human recombinant LYPD8 (product no. 9087-C4, Novus Biological, CO, USA) ( Okumura et al ., 2016 ) before infection of MEPC5 cells. ..



    Similar Products

    human recombinant lypd8  (Novus Biologicals)
    90
    Novus Biologicals human recombinant lypd8
    RT-qPCR analysis and comparison of modulation of antimicrobial factors in caput and cauda epididymidis and <t>Lypd8</t> assessment in mouse and in vitro assay. ( A ) beta-defensins, ( B ) UPEC-associated antimicrobial factors. Unpaired t test ( * ) or Mann–Whitney U test (#) for each organ, respectively, comparing sham to UPEC-infected mice ( **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05). Fold change calculated via 2 (−ddCT) method. Data presented as box-and-whisker with median and min/max. cap = caput, cau = cauda. Sham 10 days, caput n = 4, cauda n = 4; UPEC 10 days, caput n = 4, cauda n = 6. ( C ) Laser-assisted microdissection of caput epithelium and caput interstitium from wild-type epididymis, n = 2. Relative expression calculated via 2 (−dCT) method. Data presented as mean ± SD. ( D ) Bacterial adherence to MEPC5 cells under the presence (+) or absence (−) of 1 μg/ml human recombinant LYPD8 (hLYPD8). CFU/ml were calculated after incubation of agar plates at 37°C for 24 h. Summary of three independent experiments with each time n = 2–3 per group. Unpaired t test comparing the number of MEPC5-adherent UPEC in the presence or absence of LYPD8 ( **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05).
    Human Recombinant Lypd8, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+recombinant+lypd8/Recombinant+Human+LYPD8+Fc+Chimera+Protein%2C+CF/pmc07187874-78-29-35
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human recombinant lypd8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    RT-qPCR analysis and comparison of modulation of antimicrobial factors in caput and cauda epididymidis and Lypd8 assessment in mouse and in vitro assay. ( A ) beta-defensins, ( B ) UPEC-associated antimicrobial factors. Unpaired t test ( * ) or Mann–Whitney U test (#) for each organ, respectively, comparing sham to UPEC-infected mice ( **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05). Fold change calculated via 2 (−ddCT) method. Data presented as box-and-whisker with median and min/max. cap = caput, cau = cauda. Sham 10 days, caput n = 4, cauda n = 4; UPEC 10 days, caput n = 4, cauda n = 6. ( C ) Laser-assisted microdissection of caput epithelium and caput interstitium from wild-type epididymis, n = 2. Relative expression calculated via 2 (−dCT) method. Data presented as mean ± SD. ( D ) Bacterial adherence to MEPC5 cells under the presence (+) or absence (−) of 1 μg/ml human recombinant LYPD8 (hLYPD8). CFU/ml were calculated after incubation of agar plates at 37°C for 24 h. Summary of three independent experiments with each time n = 2–3 per group. Unpaired t test comparing the number of MEPC5-adherent UPEC in the presence or absence of LYPD8 ( **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05).

    Journal: Molecular Human Reproduction

    Article Title: Differential tissue-specific damage caused by bacterial epididymo-orchitis in the mouse

    doi: 10.1093/molehr/gaaa011

    Figure Lengend Snippet: RT-qPCR analysis and comparison of modulation of antimicrobial factors in caput and cauda epididymidis and Lypd8 assessment in mouse and in vitro assay. ( A ) beta-defensins, ( B ) UPEC-associated antimicrobial factors. Unpaired t test ( * ) or Mann–Whitney U test (#) for each organ, respectively, comparing sham to UPEC-infected mice ( **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05). Fold change calculated via 2 (−ddCT) method. Data presented as box-and-whisker with median and min/max. cap = caput, cau = cauda. Sham 10 days, caput n = 4, cauda n = 4; UPEC 10 days, caput n = 4, cauda n = 6. ( C ) Laser-assisted microdissection of caput epithelium and caput interstitium from wild-type epididymis, n = 2. Relative expression calculated via 2 (−dCT) method. Data presented as mean ± SD. ( D ) Bacterial adherence to MEPC5 cells under the presence (+) or absence (−) of 1 μg/ml human recombinant LYPD8 (hLYPD8). CFU/ml were calculated after incubation of agar plates at 37°C for 24 h. Summary of three independent experiments with each time n = 2–3 per group. Unpaired t test comparing the number of MEPC5-adherent UPEC in the presence or absence of LYPD8 ( **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05).

    Article Snippet: To assess the effects of LYPD8 on bacterial adherence to epididymal epithelial cells in vitro , UPEC were pre-incubated for 1 h on ice with or without 1 μg/ml human recombinant LYPD8 (product no. 9087-C4, Novus Biological, CO, USA) ( Okumura et al ., 2016 ) before infection of MEPC5 cells.

    Techniques: Quantitative RT-PCR, Comparison, In Vitro, MANN-WHITNEY, Infection, Whisker Assay, Laser Capture Microdissection, Expressing, Recombinant, Incubation